Paris-Saclay University

Updated 9 मई 2026
Country
France
Founded
2015
Type
Education
ROR
03xjwb503
FWUR Rank#44 globally (of 4,980)#2 in France
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 96.5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 13–351 (338 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped ARWU (#13, most generous score) and RUR (#351, harshest score).

ARWU
13[src]of 996
CWUR
34[src]of 1,929
THE
68[src]of 2,119
QS
70[src]of 1,462
SCImago
200[src]of 4,699
RUR
351[src]of 1,139
FWUR
44of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS1.7
  • THE0.1
  • ARWU1.8
  • CWUR1.3
  • SCImago1.2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
97.3ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
96.1QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
83.8CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2023/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #44 · 96.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
97.3
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
96.1
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
83.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 96.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#34
cwur.org
RUR2023
#351
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#200
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

QS climbed #226 → #71 (2010–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#40020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲13#39QS▼2#71THE▲35#58ARWU▲3#12CWUR▲1#31RURNo dataSCImago▼46#166
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010#226
2011#208
2012#218
2013#189
2014
2015#209
2016#241#335
2017#241
2018#242
2019#239
2020#262#14#32#259
2021#305#178#13#32#169
2022#86#117#16#32#191
2023#69#93#15#32#351#120
2024#71#58#12#31#166

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Polytechnic Institute of Paris42.0
2Sorbonne Université47.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityसंयुक्त राज्य1.0
2Tsinghua Universityचीन17.0
3The University of Melbourneऑस्ट्रेलिया27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources