National Cheng Kung University

Updated 9 मई 2026
Country
Taiwan
Founded
1931
Type
Education
ROR
01b8kcc49
FWUR Rank#379 globally (of 4,980)#4 in Taiwan
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 76.9/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 203–1,187 (984 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#203, most generous score) and ARWU (#401, harshest score).

QS
203[src]of 1,462
RUR
257[src]of 1,128
ARWU
401[src]of 996
CWUR
406[src]of 1,929
THE
501[src]of 2,119
SCImago
1,187[src]of 4,699
FWUR
379of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS9.3
  • THE0.5
  • ARWU17
  • CWUR2.1
  • RUR0.4
  • SCImago2.1

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
67.3ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
81.3QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
78.2CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #379 · 76.9
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
67.3
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
81.3
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
78.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 76.9 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#406
cwur.org
RUR2025
#257
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1187
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #374 → #1094 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲16#415QS▼3#228THE▲100#501ARWU▼100#401CWUR▼14#375RUR▲74#304SCImago▲128#1094
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#301
2006#301
2007#305
2008#303
2009#201#374
2010#283#201#260#328
2011#285#201#238#301
2012#271#201#256#279
2013#247#301#301#253#258
2014#301#201#246#214#268
2015#232#351#301#226#223#290
2016#224#401#401#247#225#377
2017#241#401#301#239#200#287
2018#222#501#301#297#275#463
2019#234#501#301#314#262#334
2020#225#601#301#325#303#934
2021#234#501#401#331#341#1045
2022#252#601#301#349#338#1139
2023#225#601#301#361#378#1222
2024#228#501#401#375#304#1094

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1National Tsing Hua University363.0
2National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University276.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityसंयुक्त राज्य1.0
2University of Oxfordयूनाइटेड किंगडम5.0
3The University of Melbourneऑस्ट्रेलिया27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources