KIIT University

Updated 9 मई 2026
Country
India
Founded
2004
Type
Education
ROR
00k8zt527
FWUR Rank#1,507 globally (of 4,980)#60 in India
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 31.6/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 501–4,900 (4,399 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#501, most generous score) and SCImago (#4,900, harshest score).

THE
501[src]of 2,119
QS
1,001[src]of 1,462
SCImago
4,900[src]of 4,699
FWUR
1,507of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS0
  • THE44.8
  • SCImago31.6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
54QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
No data

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,507 · 31.6
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
54
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
No data
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 31.6 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR
RUR
SCImago2025
#4900
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

THE climbed #1001 → #601 (2019–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲39#1347QSNo dataTHE#601ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImago▲1141#4308
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013#4583
2014#4179
2015#4276
2016#4179
2017#3852
2018#4539
2019#1001#2747
2020#1001#5998
2021#1001#6359
2022#801#6202
2023#601#5449
2024#601#4308

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar1488.0
2Lovely Professional University1546.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityसंयुक्त राज्य1.0
2University of Oxfordयूनाइटेड किंगडम5.0
3Tsinghua Universityचीन17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources