IMT Lille Douai

Updated 9 मई 2026
Country
France
Founded
2017
Type
Education
ROR
042rh9p26
FWUR Rank#671 globally (of 4,980)#35 in France
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 62.2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.11 of 6 agenciesMixed agency signal

But the 1 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 801–801 (0 positions apart).

THE
801[src]of 2,119
FWUR
671of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE0

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
No data

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
62.2THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
No data

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #671 · 62.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
No data
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
62.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
No data
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 62.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR
RUR
SCImago

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲31#1051QSNo dataTHE#1001ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImagoNo data
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023#1001
2024#1001

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityसंयुक्त राज्य1.0
2Tsinghua Universityचीन17.0
3The University of Melbourneऑस्ट्रेलिया27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources