Georgia Institute of Technology

Updated 9 मई 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1885
Type
Education
ROR
01zkghx44
FWUR Rank#93 globally (of 4,980)#40 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 94/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 41–231 (190 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#41, most generous score) and ARWU (#151, harshest score).

THE
41[src]of 2,119
CWUR
74[src]of 1,929
RUR
81[src]of 1,128
QS
123[src]of 1,462
ARWU
151[src]of 996
SCImago
231[src]of 4,699
FWUR
93of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS2.3
  • THE4.1
  • ARWU9
  • CWUR2.2
  • RUR1.1
  • SCImago1.1

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
90ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
94.9QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
94.6CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #93 · 94
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
90
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
94.9
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
94.6
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 94 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#74
cwur.org
SCImago2025
#231
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #47 → #195 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#50#100#150#20020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼9#86QS▼9#97THE▲2#36ARWU#151CWUR▼3#70RUR▼18#92SCImago▼7#195
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#101
2006#102
2007#97#102
2008#83#101
2009#86#101#47
2010#106#101#40#47
2011#84#27#102#37#54
2012#88#24#101#87#47#58
2013#99#25#101#100#74#63
2014#107#28#99#83#80#71
2015#107#27#101#80#74#76
2016#84#41#93#86#71#84
2017#71#33#85#95#66#87
2018#70#33#79#139#90#91
2019#69#34#101#82#89#73
2020#72#38#101#74#140#140
2021#80#38#101#76#72#150
2022#88#45#151#68#137#159
2023#88#38#151#67#74#188
2024#97#36#151#70#92#195

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of California, Davis92.0
2Penn State University94.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of Oxfordयूनाइटेड किंगडम5.0
2Tsinghua Universityचीन17.0
3The University of Melbourneऑस्ट्रेलिया27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources