Chapman University

Updated 9 मई 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1861
Type
Education
ROR
0452jzg20
FWUR Rank#1,797 globally (of 4,980)#255 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 38.6/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 801–2,887 (2,086 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#801, most generous score) and CWUR (#1,606, harshest score).

THE
801[src]of 1,868
CWUR
1,606[src]of 1,929
SCImago
2,887[src]of 4,699
FWUR
1,797of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR10.9
  • SCImago10.9

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
38.6SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
57.2THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
16.8CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2024/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,797 · 38.6
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
38.6
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
57.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
16.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 38.6 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR2025
#1606
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#2887
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #3167 → #3487 (2011–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲307#1881QSNo dataTHE#801ARWUNo dataCWUR▲23#1620RURNo dataSCImago▲285#3487
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011#3167
2012#3106
2013#3215
2014#3415
2015#3501
2016#3189
2017#3353
2018#3545
2019#1676#1698
2020#1658#2406
2021#601#1644#2097
2022#801#1632#3271
2023#801#1643#3772
2024#801#1620#3487

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Rowan University1778.0
2New York City College of Technology, CUNY1777.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of Oxfordयूनाइटेड किंगडम5.0
2Tsinghua Universityचीन17.0
3The University of Melbourneऑस्ट्रेलिया27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources