Walailak University

Updated 9 may 2026
Country
Thailand
Founded
1992
Type
Education
ROR
04b69g067
FWUR Rank#3026 globally (of 4980)#22 in Thailand
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 4,2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 1201–4820 (3619 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1201, most generous score) and SCImago (#4820, harshest score).

THE
1201[src]of 2119
QS
1401[src]of 1462
SCImago
4820[src]of 4699
FWUR
3026of 4980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS0
  • THE39,1
  • SCImago4,2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
23,8QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
No data

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #3,026 · 4.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
23.8
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
No data
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 4.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR
RUR
SCImago2025
#4820
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #4601 → #4982 (2018–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲385#2150QSNo dataTHE▲300#1201ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImago▲1095#4982
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018#4601
2019#1595
2020#4730
2021#5201
2022#6065
2023#1501#6077
2024#1201#4982

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Silpakorn University3011.0
2Naresuan University3007.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources