Villanova University

Updated 9 may 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1842
Type
Education
ROR
02g7kd627
FWUR Rank#1925 globally (of 4980)#261 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 49,5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 298–4764 (4466 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped RUR (#298, most generous score) and SCImago (#4764, harshest score).

RUR
298[src]of 685
CWUR
976[src]of 1929
SCImago
4764[src]of 4699
FWUR
1925of 4980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR24,7
  • SCImago24,7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
53CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2016/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,925 · 49.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
53
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 49.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
ARWU
CWUR2025
#976
cwur.org
RUR2016
#298
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#4764
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2033 → #4795 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼43#1763QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▲38#959RURNo dataSCImago▲254#4795
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2033
2010#499#1952
2011#512#2033
2012#554#2122
2013#406#2442
2014#390#2444
2015#421#2759
2016#298#2179
2017#2593
2018#2835
2019#942#1804
2020#1004#3433
2021#1043#4283
2022#1025#4315
2023#997#5049
2024#959#4795

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources