Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie

Updated 9 may 2026
Country
Poland
Founded
1944
Type
Education
ROR
03hq67y94
FWUR Rank#2200 globally (of 4980)#38 in Poland
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 8,7/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 1501–4334 (2833 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1501, most generous score) and SCImago (#4334, harshest score).

THE
1501[src]of 2119
CWUR
1810[src]of 1982
SCImago
4334[src]of 4699
FWUR
2200of 4980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE10,7
  • SCImago10,7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
7,8SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
29,2THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
8,7CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2019/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,200 · 8.7
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
7.8
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
29.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
8.7
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 8.7 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR2019
#1810
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#4334
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #3597 → #4555 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲250#2581QSNo dataTHE#1501ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImago▼278#4555
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3597
2010#3817
2011#4049
2012#4316
2013#4522
2014#4721
2015#4714
2016#4557
2017#4756
2018#4968
2019#1810#2192
2020#4224
2021#4216
2022#3528
2023#4277
2024#1501#4555

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources