University of Maryland, Baltimore

Updated 9 may 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1807
Type
Education
ROR
04rq5mt64
FWUR Rank#474 globally (of 4980)#112 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 71,8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 313–801 (488 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#506, most generous score) and QS (#801, harshest score).

CWUR
313[src]of 1929
ARWU
401[src]of 996
SCImago
506[src]of 4699
QS
801[src]of 1462
FWUR
474of 4980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS26,6
  • ARWU12
  • CWUR12
  • SCImago17,4

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
74,5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
45,3QS

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
83,8CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #474 · 71.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
74.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
45.3
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
83.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 71.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

THE
CWUR2025
#313
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#506
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #160 → #444 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#40020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼17#254QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU#301CWUR▼3#306RURNo dataSCImago▼276#444
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#153
2006#151
2007#151
2008#152
2009#152#160
2010#151#168
2011#151#170
2012#151#160
2013#151#179
2014#201#183#164
2015#201#175#160
2016#201#174#166
2017#201#173#143
2018#201#210#70
2019#201#253#38
2020#201#279#78
2021#301#286#74
2022#301#301#135
2023#301#303#168
2024#301#306#444

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Tulane University473.0
2University of Cincinnati472.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources