University of Dayton

Updated 9 may 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1850
Type
Education
ROR
021v3qy27
FWUR Rank#2137 globally (of 4980)#275 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 23,9/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 801–3957 (3156 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#801, most generous score) and SCImago (#3957, harshest score).

THE
801[src]of 1765
CWUR
1469[src]of 1929
SCImago
3957[src]of 4699
FWUR
2137of 4980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR4
  • SCImago4

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
15,8SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
54,7THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
23,9CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2023/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,137 · 23.9
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
15.8
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
54.7
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
23.9
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 23.9 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR2025
#1469
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#3957
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1522 → #3671 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼288#1866QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR#1393RURNo dataSCImago▲283#3671
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1522
2010#1541
2011#1517
2012#1811
2013#1830
2014#538#2067
2015#445#2149
2016#466#1609
2017#530#2530
2018#601#2116
2019#601#1053#1748
2020#1101#4187
2021#1178#3993
2022#1273#4145
2023#801#1393#3954
2024#1393#3671

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Pepperdine University2139.0
2Pomona College2142.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources