Universiti Malaysia Pahang

Updated 9 may 2026
Country
Malaysia
Founded
2002
Type
Education
ROR
01704wp68
FWUR Rank#1105 globally (of 4980)#14 in Malaysia
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 31,8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.15 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 5 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 601–4409 (3808 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#601, most generous score) and CWUR (#1981, harshest score).

THE
601[src]of 2119
QS
609[src]of 1462
RUR
782[src]of 1128
CWUR
1981[src]of 1930
SCImago
4409[src]of 4699
FWUR
1105of 4980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS13,8
  • THE27,1
  • RUR13,8
  • SCImago38,4

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
6,2SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
65QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
15,4CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2023/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,105 · 31.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
6.2
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
65
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
15.4
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 31.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR2023
#1981
cwur.org
RUR2025
#782
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#4409
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #3210 → #4167 (2011–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲391#1139QS▲160#781THE▲200#601ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRUR▲148#635SCImago▼895#4167
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011#3210
2012#3663
2013#3665
2014#3780
2015#3364
2016#3152
2017#2960
2018#3358
2019#1348
2020#751#2479
2021#751#2993
2022#801#668#3456
2023#941#801#1981#783#3272
2024#781#601#635#4167

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman1068.0
2Taylor's University1058.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources