Université Clermont Auvergne

Updated 9 may 2026
Country
France
Founded
2017
Type
Education
ROR
01a8ajp46
FWUR Rank#906 globally (of 4980)#45 in France
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 52,1/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 486–2289 (1803 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#486, most generous score) and ARWU (#701, harshest score).

CWUR
486[src]of 1929
ARWU
701[src]of 996
THE
1001[src]of 2119
SCImago
2289[src]of 4699
FWUR
906of 4980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE0,7
  • ARWU22,3
  • CWUR22,8
  • SCImago0,7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
40,5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
52,8THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
74,9CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #906 · 52.1
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
40.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
52.8
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
74.9
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 52.1 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
CWUR2025
#486
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#2289
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #2154 → #1811 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼4#750QSNo dataTHE#801ARWU#601CWUR▼23#463RURNo dataSCImago▲60#1811
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2154
2010#2258
2011#2476
2012#2174
2013#2073
2014#401#789#1954
2015#401#769#2013
2016#501#750#1459
2017#601#613#1655
2018#501#601#594#1847
2019#601#601#462#610
2020#601#501#428#1514
2021#601#501#439#1378
2022#801#501#423#1663
2023#801#601#440#1871
2024#801#601#463#1811

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources