The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Updated 9 may 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1972
Type
Education
ROR
03gds6c39
FWUR Rank#330 globally (of 4980)#86 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 79,9/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 201–988 (787 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#262, most generous score) and SCImago (#988, harshest score).

ARWU
201[src]of 996
CWUR
262[src]of 1929
SCImago
988[src]of 4699
FWUR
330of 4980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU0
  • CWUR6,5
  • SCImago0,9

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
79,5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
86,5CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #330 · 79.9
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
79.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
86.5
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 79.9 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#262
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#988
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #471 → #998 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼47#362QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU▼100#301CWUR▲1#255RURNo dataSCImago▲9#998
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#153
2006#151
2007#151
2008#152
2009#152#471
2010#151#477
2011#151#482
2012#151#448
2013#151#403
2014#201#274#407
2015#201#249#386
2016#201#232#344
2017#301#222#434
2018#301#194#601
2019#201#200#286
2020#301#231#699
2021#301#244#782
2022#301#251#871
2023#201#256#1007
2024#301#255#998

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of California, Riverside339.0
2Stony Brook University341.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources