Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi

Updated 9 may 2026
Country
Türkiye
Founded
1992
Type
Education
ROR
053f2w588
FWUR Rank#3164 globally (of 4980)#99 in Türkiye
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 0,6/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 1115–7230 (6115 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1501, most generous score) and CWUR (#1943, harshest score).

RUR
1115[src]of 1128
THE
1501[src]of 2119
CWUR
1943[src]of 1929
SCImago
7230[src]of 4699
FWUR
3164of 4980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE28,6
  • CWUR0,6
  • RUR0,6
  • SCImago0,6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
29,2THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
0,6CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #3,164 · 0.6
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
29.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
0.6
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 0.6 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR2025
#1943
cwur.org
RUR2025
#1115
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#7230
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #3434 → #6996 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼331#2934QSNo dataTHE#1501ARWUNo dataCWUR▼84#1885RURNo dataSCImago▼493#6996
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3434
2010#3598
2011#3746
2012#3902
2013#4144
2014#4126
2015#4210
2016#4395
2017#4262
2018#4772
2019#1648#2027
2020#1764#4887
2021#1782#5374
2022#1797#5595
2023#1501#1801#6503
2024#1501#1885#6996

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Omer Halisdemir Üniversitesi3179.0
2Usak Üniversitesi3109.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources