Louisiana Tech University

Updated 9 may 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1894
Type
Education
ROR
04q9esz89
FWUR Rank#2345 globally (of 4980)#294 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 32/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 801–5129 (4328 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#801, most generous score) and SCImago (#5129, harshest score).

THE
801[src]of 1506
CWUR
1313[src]of 1929
SCImago
5129[src]of 4699
FWUR
2345of 4980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR16
  • SCImago16

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
46,9THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
32CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2021/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,345 · 32
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
46.9
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
32
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 32 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR2025
#1313
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#5129
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1699 → #4411 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼232#2096QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▼125#1255RURNo dataSCImago▲135#4411
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1699
2010#1741
2011#2082
2012#2344
2013#2561
2014#639#2850
2015#625#3503
2016#667#3189
2017#662#3276
2018#2927
2019#601#1031#1647
2020#801#1000#3760
2021#801#1005#3384
2022#1033#4049
2023#1130#4546
2024#1255#4411

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Manhattan College2347.0
2United States Military Academy2330.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources