Jiangsu University

Updated 9 may 2026
Country
China
Founded
1902
Type
Education
ROR
03jc41j30
FWUR Rank#411 globally (of 4980)#63 in China
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 75,4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.15 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 5 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 301–501 (200 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#406, most generous score) and RUR (#468, harshest score).

ARWU
301[src]of 996
CWUR
388[src]of 1929
SCImago
406[src]of 4699
RUR
468[src]of 1128
THE
501[src]of 2119
FWUR
411of 4980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE1
  • ARWU5,5
  • CWUR4,5
  • RUR16,8
  • SCImago16

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
80,6ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
76,4THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
69,3CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #411 · 75.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
80.6
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
76.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
69.3
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 75.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
CWUR2025
#388
cwur.org
RUR2025
#468
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#406
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #3364 → #391 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼8#416QSNo dataTHE#601ARWU#201CWUR▲33#427RUR▲63#476SCImago▼26#391
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3364
2010#3253
2011#2955
2012#2478
2013#1718
2014#941#1229
2015#947#959
2016#955#770
2017#801#601#887#526
2018#801#601#724#708#559
2019#801#401#721#641#384
2020#801#301#639#597#794
2021#801#301#595#625#553
2022#801#201#508#655#458
2023#601#201#460#539#365
2024#601#201#427#476#391

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources