Institut Teknologi Bandung

Updated 9 may 2026
Country
Indonesia
Founded
1920
Type
Education
ROR
00apj8t60
FWUR Rank#1228 globally (of 4980)#8 in Indonesia
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 40,1/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 255–2970 (2715 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#255, most generous score) and CWUR (#1900, harshest score).

QS
255[src]of 1462
THE
1201[src]of 2119
CWUR
1900[src]of 1929
SCImago
2970[src]of 4699
FWUR
1228of 4980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS42,5
  • THE3,3
  • CWUR38,5
  • SCImago3,3

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
36,8SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
63QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
1,6CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,228 · 40.1
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
36.8
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
63
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
1.6
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 40.1 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR2025
#1900
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#2970
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #3315 → #2472 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲408#1215QS▼46#281THE#1201ARWUNo dataCWUR▲7#1887RURNo dataSCImago▲907#2472
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3315
2010#401#3569
2011#451#3839
2012#451#4002
2013#461#4210
2014#4209
2015#461#4001
2016#431#3790
2017#401#801#3561
2018#331#801#3582
2019#359#801#1659
2020#331#1001#3635
2021#313#1001#3638
2022#303#1001#1953#3348
2023#235#1201#1894#3379
2024#281#1201#1887#2472

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Binus University1184.0
2Universitas Brawijaya1285.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources