Dalian University of Technology

Updated 9 may 2026
Country
China
Founded
1949
Type
Education
ROR
023hj5876
FWUR Rank#301 globally (of 4980)#48 in China
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 81,8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 151–482 (331 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#237, most generous score) and QS (#482, harshest score).

ARWU
151[src]of 996
CWUR
231[src]of 1929
SCImago
237[src]of 4699
RUR
305[src]of 1128
THE
401[src]of 2119
QS
482[src]of 1462
FWUR
301of 4980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS14,7
  • THE0,7
  • ARWU3,1
  • CWUR6,3
  • RUR8,7
  • SCImago13,2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
90ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
74,1QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
80,6CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #301 · 81.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
90
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
74.1
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
80.6
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 81.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#231
cwur.org
RUR2025
#305
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#237
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #1256 → #227 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲53#354QS▲77#491THE▲200#401ARWU#201CWUR▲8#258RUR▲90#315SCImago▼26#227
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008#402
2009#402#1256
2010#401#406#1025
2011#401#375#820
2012#401#389#614
2013#401#475#467
2014#301#242#420#374
2015#301#305#478#313
2016#601#301#323#428#283
2017#481#601#301#327#458#196
2018#551#601#201#346#446#258
2019#571#601#201#327#468#194
2020#571#601#201#313#427#420
2021#591#601#301#303#366#322
2022#571#601#201#282#349#239
2023#568#601#201#266#405#201
2024#491#401#201#258#315#227

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Lanzhou University300.0
2Chongqing University298.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources