Dalian Polytechnic University

Updated 9 may 2026
Country
China
Founded
1958
Type
Education
ROR
00c7x4a95
FWUR Rank#1887 globally (of 4980)#235 in China
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 24,1/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 901–3415 (2514 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#3415, most generous score) and ARWU (#901, harshest score).

ARWU
901[src]of 993
CWUR
1466[src]of 1929
SCImago
3415[src]of 4699
FWUR
1887of 4980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR1,6
  • SCImago1,6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
18,4ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
24,1CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2024/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,887 · 24.1
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
18.4
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
24.1
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 24.1 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#1466
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#3415
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #3656 → #3234 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼249#2652QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU#901CWUR▲123#1745RURNo dataSCImago▼706#3234
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3656
2010#3869
2011#4006
2012#4041
2013#4017
2014#3848
2015#3552
2016#3740
2017#3527
2018#3042
2019#2718
2020#5135
2021#3907
2022#1966#4283
2023#901#1868#2528
2024#901#1745#3234

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Huaiyin Institute of Technology1884.0
2Tianjin Normal University1892.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources