Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Technology

Updated 9 may 2026
Country
South Korea
Founded
2004
Type
Education
ROR
03frjya69
FWUR Rank#509 globally (of 4980)#14 in South Korea
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 70/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 351–1632 (1281 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#351, most generous score) and CWUR (#1139, harshest score).

THE
351[src]of 2119
QS
370[src]of 1462
CWUR
1139[src]of 1929
SCImago
1632[src]of 4699
FWUR
509of 4980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS4,7
  • THE13,5
  • CWUR29
  • SCImago4,7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
65,3SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
79,1QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
41CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #509 · 70
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
65.3
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
79.1
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
41
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 70 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR2025
#1139
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#1632
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1387 → #1528 (2021–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲341#452QS#307THE#351ARWUNo dataCWUR▲16#1157RURNo dataSCImago▼183#1528
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019#1236
2020#1288
2021#1235#1387
2022#1189#1590
2023#1173#1345
2024#307#351#1157#1528

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Kyungpook National University499.0
2Chung-Ang University536.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources