University of North Texas

Updated May 9, 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1890
Type
Education
ROR
00v97ad02
FWUR Rank#1,057 globally (of 4,980)#200 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 43.7/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.15 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 5 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 558–2,219 (1,661 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#718, most generous score) and RUR (#558, harshest score).

RUR
558[src]of 669
ARWU
601[src]of 996
CWUR
718[src]of 1,929
QS
901[src]of 1,462
SCImago
2,219[src]of 4,699
FWUR
1,057of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS7.8
  • ARWU6.5
  • CWUR16.6
  • SCImago6.5

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
46.3ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
38.4QS

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
39.8CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2014/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,057 · 43.7
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
46.3
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
38.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
39.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 43.7 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

THE
CWUR2025
#718
cwur.org
RUR2014
#558
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#2219
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1417 → #1952 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲147#871QS▲167#1001THENo dataARWU#501CWUR▼15#712RURNo dataSCImago▲633#1952
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1417
2010#1489
2011#1476
2012#427#1525
2013#553#1573
2014#747#558#1722
2015#778#1721
2016#301#748#1501
2017#301#736#1348
2018#301#682#1142
2019#401#667#777
2020#401#711#2041
2021#401#710#2461
2022#1001#401#695#2517
2023#1168#501#697#2585
2024#1001#501#712#1952

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Brigham Young University1049.0
2Northern Arizona University1047.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordUnited Kingdom5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources