University of Illinois at Chicago

Updated May 9, 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1858
Type
Education
ROR
02mpq6x41
FWUR Rank#230 globally (of 4,980)#70 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 86.1/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 96–477 (381 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped RUR (#96, most generous score) and ARWU (#401, harshest score).

RUR
96[src]of 1,128
THE
201[src]of 2,119
CWUR
254[src]of 1,929
QS
334[src]of 1,462
ARWU
401[src]of 996
SCImago
477[src]of 4,699
FWUR
230of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS8.9
  • THE4.4
  • ARWU26.3
  • CWUR0.7
  • RUR5.4
  • SCImago3.7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
74.9ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
83.9QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
89.2CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #230 · 86.1
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
74.9
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
83.9
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
89.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 86.1 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#254
cwur.org
SCImago2025
#477
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #169 → #422 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#40020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲7#218QS▼5#323THE▲50#201ARWU#301CWUR▼3#243RUR▼34#103SCImago▲26#422
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#101
2006#102
2007#102
2008#101
2009#152#169
2010#252#151#73#180
2011#162#197#151#97#193
2012#180#167#151#79#190
2013#192#184#151#78#184
2014#186#191#151#218#89#197
2015#186#201#151#203#84#189
2016#185#201#201#185#73#158
2017#187#200#201#185#79#228
2018#207#251#201#217#82#302
2019#214#251#201#220#82#175
2020#231#251#201#210#67#388
2021#256#251#201#214#399
2022#285#301#301#233#83#371
2023#318#251#301#240#69#448
2024#323#201#301#243#103#422

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Tufts University232.0
2Northeastern University, USA226.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordUnited Kingdom5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources