University of Akron

Updated May 9, 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1870
Type
Education
ROR
02kyckx55
FWUR Rank#985 globally (of 4,980)#188 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 40.1/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 430–2,179 (1,749 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#2,179, most generous score) and ARWU (#901, harshest score).

RUR
430[src]of 669
ARWU
901[src]of 993
CWUR
1,076[src]of 1,929
SCImago
2,179[src]of 4,699
FWUR
985of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR4.7
  • SCImago4.7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
31.5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
40.1CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2014/2020/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #985 · 40.1
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
31.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
40.1
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 40.1 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#1076
cwur.org
RUR2014
#430
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#2179
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1148 → #1897 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼58#879QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▼16#1001RURNo dataSCImago▼29#1897
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#401
2006#401
2007#403
2008#402
2009#1148
2010#295#1320
2011#285#1436
2012#354#1619
2013#467#1615
2014#482#430#1711
2015#543#1468
2016#494#1349
2017#701#507#1048
2018#801#677#971
2019#801#766#763
2020#901#874#2023
2021#878#1784
2022#949#1948
2023#985#1868
2024#1001#1897

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordUnited Kingdom5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources