Universität Bielefeld

Updated May 9, 2026
Country
Germany
Founded
1969
Type
Education
ROR
02hpadn98
FWUR Rank#1,053 globally (of 4,980)#53 in Germany
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 51/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 201–2,315 (2,114 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#201, most generous score) and ARWU (#701, harshest score).

THE
201[src]of 1,765
RUR
490[src]of 1,128
CWUR
674[src]of 1,929
ARWU
701[src]of 996
QS
1,001[src]of 1,462
SCImago
2,315[src]of 4,699
FWUR
1,053of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS14.7
  • ARWU16.6
  • CWUR18.8
  • RUR10.3
  • SCImago4.4

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
40.2ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
60.1QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
60.9CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2023/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,053 · 51
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
40.2
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
60.1
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
60.9
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 51 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#674
cwur.org
RUR2025
#490
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#2315
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #862 → #2045 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼184#987QS▲78#951THENo dataARWU▲100#601CWUR▼12#662RUR▼127#501SCImago▲51#2045
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#301
2006#301
2007#305
2008#303
2009#303#862
2010#316#301#239#869
2011#355#173#301#236#893
2012#384#251#401#307#1021
2013#431#276#401#343#974
2014#301#401#491#356#1008
2015#501#351#401#464#357#1174
2016#501#251#401#475#312#1251
2017#601#251#401#510#253#1045
2018#651#251#401#542#298#1106
2019#701#201#501#542#345#592
2020#751#166#701#597#322#1314
2021#801#158#601#629#330#1646
2022#801#166#701#644#297#1795
2023#1029#201#701#650#374#2096
2024#951#601#662#501#2045

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Universität Mannheim1001.0
2Hochschule für Wirtschaft und Recht Berlin1132.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityUnited States1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources