Smith College

Updated May 9, 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1871
Type
Education
ROR
0497crr92
FWUR Rank#2,651 globally (of 4,980)#305 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 28.4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 601–6,758 (6,157 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#601, most generous score) and SCImago (#6,758, harshest score).

QS
601[src]of 1,273
CWUR
1,382[src]of 1,929
SCImago
6,758[src]of 4,699
FWUR
2,651of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR14.2
  • SCImago14.2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
52.9QS

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
28.4CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2022/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,651 · 28.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
52.9
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
28.4
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 28.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

THE
ARWU
CWUR2025
#1382
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#6758
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #3118 → #6404 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼235#2242QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▲11#1266RURNo dataSCImago▲67#6404
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3118
2010#3201
2011#551#3255
2012#551#3368
2013#601#3267
2014#3508
2015#701#3556
2016#701#3941
2017#701#4559
2018#701#4294
2019#601#1543#2826
2020#601#1036#5267
2021#601#1056#5984
2022#601#1188#5696
2023#1277#6471
2024#1266#6404

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordUnited Kingdom5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources