National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology

Updated May 9, 2026
Country
Taiwan
Founded
2018
Type
Education
ROR
00hfj7g70
FWUR Rank#2,314 globally (of 4,980)#34 in Taiwan
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 16.8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 1,119–4,063 (2,944 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1,201, most generous score) and RUR (#1,119, harshest score).

RUR
1,119[src]of 1,128
THE
1,201[src]of 2,119
CWUR
1,545[src]of 1,929
SCImago
4,063[src]of 4,699
FWUR
2,314of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE26.6
  • CWUR3.2
  • RUR15.9
  • SCImago3.2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
13.6SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
43.4THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
10.4CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,314 · 16.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
13.6
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
43.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
10.4
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 16.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR2025
#1545
cwur.org
RUR2025
#1119
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#4063
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2114 → #4609 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲93#2388QSNo dataTHE▲300#1201ARWUNo dataCWUR▼23#1493RUR▲144#1016SCImago▼124#4609
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2114
2010#2463
2011#2622
2012#2878
2013#3324
2014#3450
2015#3603
2016#4065
2017#3982
2018#3287
2019#1232#2585
2020#1292#4046
2021#1331#4243
2022#1417#4830
2023#1501#1470#1160#4485
2024#1201#1493#1016#4609

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1National Dong Hwa University2319.0
2Soochow University, Taiwan2294.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityUnited States1.0
2University of OxfordUnited Kingdom5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources