Karaganda State University

Updated May 9, 2026
Country
Kazakhstan
Founded
1972
Type
Education
ROR
00eq8hh49
FWUR Rank#2,167 globally (of 4,980)#10 in Kazakhstan
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 0/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 901–8,772 (7,871 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#901, most generous score) and RUR (#1,081, harshest score).

QS
901[src]of 1,462
RUR
1,081[src]of 1,062
SCImago
8,772[src]of 4,699
FWUR
2,167of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS19.2
  • SCImago19.2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
38.4QS

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
0RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2024/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,167 · 0
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
38.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
0
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 0 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

THE2024
Not ranked
timeshighereducation.com
ARWU
CWUR
RUR2024
#1081
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#8772
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #5632 → #8470 (2018–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWURNo dataQS▼46#851THENo dataARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRUR▲95#1081SCImago▼349#8470
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015#701
2016#701
2017#701
2018#651#5632
2019#651#3408
2020#801#794
2021#1001#828#7482
2022#801#962#7666
2023#805#1176#8121
2024#851#1081#8470

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Suleyman Demirel University2136.0
2Nazarbayev University2126.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityUnited States1.0
2University of OxfordUnited Kingdom5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources