Instituto Politécnico do Porto

Updated May 9, 2026
Country
Portugal
Founded
1985
Type
Education
ROR
04988re48
FWUR Rank#2,282 globally (of 4,980)#11 in Portugal
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 17.8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 1,501–5,121 (3,620 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1,501, most generous score) and SCImago (#5,121, harshest score).

THE
1,501[src]of 2,119
CWUR
1,587[src]of 1,929
SCImago
5,121[src]of 4,699
FWUR
2,282of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE11.4
  • CWUR0
  • SCImago17.8

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
29.2THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
17.8CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,282 · 17.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
29.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
17.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 17.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR2025
#1587
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#5121
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2415 → #4615 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲111#2465QSNo dataTHE▼200#1201ARWUNo dataCWUR▲71#1720RURNo dataSCImago▼179#4615
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2415
2010#2247
2011#2291
2012#2230
2013#2309
2014#2300
2015#2331
2016#2449
2017#2059
2018#2671
2019#601#1734#1392
2020#801#1836#3117
2021#1001#1783#3902
2022#1001#1743#4573
2023#1001#1791#4436
2024#1201#1720#4615

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityUnited States1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources