Hofstra University

Updated May 9, 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1935
Type
Education
ROR
03pm18j10
FWUR Rank#993 globally (of 4,980)#189 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 63.8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 238–2,414 (2,176 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#301, most generous score) and CWUR (#1,458, harshest score).

RUR
238[src]of 1,128
THE
301[src]of 1,639
CWUR
1,458[src]of 1,929
SCImago
2,414[src]of 4,699
FWUR
993of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR24.2
  • RUR30.3
  • SCImago0

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
48.6SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
81.7THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
51.7CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2022/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #993 · 63.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
48.6
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
81.7
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
51.7
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 63.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR2025
#1458
cwur.org
RUR2025
#238
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#2414
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #3178 → #2270 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲388#962QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▼43#1322RUR▲81#240SCImago▲968#2270
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3178
2010#3187
2011#3032
2012#3007
2013#351#2981
2014#475#3204
2015#505#2951
2016#296#2739
2017#601#265#3620
2018#401#277#2566
2019#351#1068#346#2293
2020#351#1157#296#4541
2021#501#1148#357#3958
2022#301#1230#522#3222
2023#1279#321#3238
2024#1322#240#2270

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of Wyoming997.0
2University of South Florida St Petersburg999.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordUnited Kingdom5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources