Henan Agricultural University

Updated May 9, 2026
Country
China
Founded
1912
Type
Education
ROR
04eq83d71
FWUR Rank#1,050 globally (of 4,980)#166 in China
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 46.4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 901–2,118 (1,217 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#2,118, most generous score) and ARWU (#901, harshest score).

ARWU
901[src]of 996
CWUR
1,035[src]of 1,929
SCImago
2,118[src]of 4,699
FWUR
1,050of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU36.8
  • CWUR0
  • SCImago8.6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
32.3ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
46.4CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,050 · 46.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
32.3
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
46.4
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 46.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#1035
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#2118
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #3795 → #2282 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼260#1236QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU#901CWUR▲27#1160RURNo dataSCImago▼320#2282
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3795
2010#4022
2011#4235
2012#4335
2013#4391
2014#4292
2015#3944
2016#3631
2017#3248
2018#2598
2019#1594#1577
2020#1584#2814
2021#1458#2587
2022#1262#2708
2023#1187#1962
2024#901#1160#2282

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Yanshan University1048.0
2Shantou University1054.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityUnited States1.0
2University of OxfordUnited Kingdom5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources