Cphbusiness

Updated May 9, 2026
Country
Denmark
Founded
1917
Type
Education
ROR
04sppb023
FWUR Rank#1,635 globally (of 4,980)#6 in Denmark
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 37.5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 301–4,605 (4,304 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#301, most generous score) and SCImago (#4,605, harshest score).

THE
301[src]of 1,868
ARWU
701[src]of 996
CWUR
1,056[src]of 1,929
SCImago
4,605[src]of 4,699
FWUR
1,635of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU0
  • CWUR15.6
  • SCImago27.7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
15.9ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
83.9THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
45.3CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2024/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,635 · 37.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
15.9
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
83.9
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
45.3
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 37.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS2021
Not ranked
topuniversities.com
CWUR2025
#1056
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#4605
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1116 → #3733 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼64#1298QSNo dataTHE▼50#301ARWU#701CWUR▲24#1029RURNo dataSCImago▼125#3733
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1116
2010#1450
2011#1671
2012#1774
2013#1999
2014#2190
2015#2139
2016#201#2026
2017#251#601#2216
2018#1001#201#601#2882
2019#201#701#1098#1577
2020#1001#201#801#1087#3396
2021#201#601#1100#3724
2022#201#601#1074#3731
2023#251#701#1053#3608
2024#301#701#1029#3733

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1IT-Universitetet i København1940.0
2Roskilde Universitet2804.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityUnited States1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources