COMSATS Institute of Information Technology

Updated May 9, 2026
Country
Pakistan
Founded
1998
Type
Education
ROR
00nqqvk19
FWUR Rank#635 globally (of 4,980)#2 in Pakistan
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 63.5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.15 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 5 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 601–1,447 (846 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#601, most generous score) and ARWU (#701, harshest score).

THE
601[src]of 2,119
CWUR
646[src]of 1,929
QS
664[src]of 1,462
ARWU
701[src]of 996
SCImago
1,447[src]of 4,699
FWUR
635of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS8.8
  • THE8.2
  • ARWU33.8
  • CWUR3.1
  • SCImago5.7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
49.5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
63.2QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
66.6CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #635 · 63.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
49.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
63.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
66.6
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 63.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#646
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#1447
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #2754 → #1264 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼5#664QS▲386#651THE#601ARWU▼100#601CWUR▲13#679RURNo dataSCImago▲186#1264
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2754
2010#2834
2011#3045
2012#2866
2013#2895
2014#2996
2015#2570
2016#2019
2017#601#2230
2018#601#601#917#2596
2019#751#601#501#959#900
2020#801#601#501#871#2044
2021#801#601#401#809#1688
2022#1001#801#501#745#1612
2023#1037#601#501#692#1450
2024#651#601#601#679#1264

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityUnited States1.0
2University of OxfordUnited Kingdom5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources