College of William & Mary

Updated May 9, 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1693
Type
Education
ROR
03hsf0573
FWUR Rank#889 globally (of 4,980)#172 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 47.5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 318–3,144 (2,826 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped RUR (#318, most generous score) and ARWU (#901, harshest score).

RUR
318[src]of 1,128
CWUR
715[src]of 1,929
THE
801[src]of 2,119
ARWU
901[src]of 993
QS
1,001[src]of 1,462
SCImago
3,144[src]of 4,699
FWUR
889of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS21.2
  • THE9.5
  • CWUR10.2
  • RUR19.1
  • SCImago19.7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
21.2ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
46.9QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
67.4CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2020/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #889 · 47.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
21.2
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
46.9
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
67.4
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 47.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#715
cwur.org
RUR2025
#318
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#3144
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1318 → #2613 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼126#756QS▼76#901THE▼200#601ARWUNo dataCWUR▼32#674RUR▼111#341SCImago▲205#2613
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#401
2006#401
2007#403
2008
2009#1318
2010#401#160#1297
2011#501#75#160#1320
2012#501#146#212#1374
2013#501#184#226#1459
2014#201#361#231#1616
2015#551#201#360#233#1771
2016#551#201#375#234#1827
2017#551#251#375#242#1963
2018#551#251#601#582#273#1621
2019#581#201#801#528#232#1072
2020#601#201#901#557#227#2436
2021#651#251#589#210#2323
2022#651#301#614#229#2816
2023#825#401#642#230#2818
2024#901#601#674#341#2613

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University at Albany893.0
2The University of Texas at Arlington895.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordUnited Kingdom5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources