University of Arkansas

Updated 9 مايو 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1871
Type
Education
ROR
05jbt9m15
FWUR Rank#761 globally (of 4,980)#150 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 58.5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 501–1,929 (1,428 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#601, most generous score) and QS (#1,001, harshest score).

ARWU
501[src]of 996
RUR
503[src]of 1,128
CWUR
587[src]of 1,929
THE
601[src]of 2,119
QS
1,001[src]of 1,462
SCImago
1,929[src]of 4,699
FWUR
761of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS26.9
  • THE13.2
  • ARWU8.7
  • CWUR11.1
  • RUR3
  • SCImago0.5

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
54.4ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
51.6QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
62.6CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #761 · 58.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
54.4
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
51.6
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
62.6
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 58.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#587
cwur.org
RUR2025
#503
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1929
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #873 → #1642 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼5#754QS▲151#1001THE#601ARWU#501CWUR▼19#572RUR▲49#504SCImago▲294#1642
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006#301
2007#305
2008#303
2009#303#873
2010#301#194#1032
2011#601#401#195#1157
2012#601#401#235#1152
2013#401#284#1143
2014#401#477#314#1211
2015#401#550#429#1307
2016#501#561#433#1119
2017#501#501#555#486#1117
2018#501#501#567#491#1237
2019#601#501#527#498#876
2020#801#601#601#542#484#2266
2021#1001#601#601#540#465#2198
2022#1001#601#501#548#510#1934
2023#1152#601#501#553#553#1936
2024#1001#601#501#572#504#1642

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Georgia State University763.0
2Oklahoma State University765.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of Oxfordالمملكة المتحدة5.0
2Tsinghua Universityالصين17.0
3The University of Melbourneأستراليا27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources