Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Updated 9 مايو 2026
Country
Brazil
Founded
1969
Type
Education
ROR
05msy9z54
FWUR Rank#2,157 globally (of 4,980)#39 in Brazil
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 19.1/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.15 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 5 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 901–4,284 (3,383 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#986, most generous score) and SCImago (#4,284, harshest score).

ARWU
901[src]of 996
CWUR
986[src]of 1,929
QS
1,201[src]of 1,469
THE
1,501[src]of 2,119
SCImago
4,284[src]of 4,699
FWUR
2,157of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE9.8
  • ARWU9.8
  • CWUR29.5
  • SCImago10.6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
9.2ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
23.8QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
48.9CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,157 · 19.1
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
9.2
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
23.8
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
48.9
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 19.1 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#986
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#4284
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2357 → #3158 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲402#1806QS▼62#1201THENo dataARWU#901CWUR#961RURNo dataSCImago▲780#3158
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2357
2010#2662
2011#2887
2012#3127
2013#3162
2014#3097
2015#3045
2016#2922
2017#2968
2018#801#901#886#3262
2019#801#601#858#965
2020#801#801#943#2328
2021#801#701#930#2719
2022#1001#1001#801#953#3076
2023#1139#1501#901#961#3938
2024#1201#901#961#3158

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1IME Instituto Militar de Engenharia2151.0
2Universidade Federal de Pernambuco2173.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityالولايات المتحدة1.0
2University of Oxfordالمملكة المتحدة5.0
3Tsinghua Universityالصين17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources