Technische Universität Darmstadt

Updated 9 مايو 2026
Country
Germany
Founded
1877
Type
Education
ROR
05n911h24
FWUR Rank#416 globally (of 4,980)#31 in Germany
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 76/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 202–1,373 (1,171 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#251, most generous score) and ARWU (#401, harshest score).

RUR
202[src]of 956
THE
251[src]of 2,119
QS
253[src]of 1,462
ARWU
401[src]of 996
CWUR
551[src]of 1,929
SCImago
1,373[src]of 4,699
FWUR
416of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS7.7
  • THE13.2
  • ARWU15.2
  • CWUR3.5
  • SCImago4.2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
65.3ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
85.5QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
75.2CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2022/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #416 · 76
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
65.3
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
85.5
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
75.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 76 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#551
cwur.org
RUR2022
#202
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1373
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #695 → #1267 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼23#399QS▲29#246THE▲50#251ARWU#401CWUR▼15#521RURNo dataSCImago▼172#1267
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#301
2006#301
2007#305
2008#303
2009#303#695
2010#266#301#167#654
2011#240#301#203#615
2012#275#276#301#250#595
2013#260#226#301#256#564
2014#226#401#327#235#527
2015#269#251#401#374#287#552
2016#246#201#401#385#275#531
2017#247#201#401#402#238#566
2018#272#201#401#457#250#662
2019#253#251#501#476#233#421
2020#260#251#401#467#229#962
2021#267#301#501#477#211#1092
2022#269#301#401#493#202#1038
2023#275#301#401#506#1095
2024#246#251#401#521#1267

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena433.0
2Universität Stuttgart446.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityالولايات المتحدة1.0
2Tsinghua Universityالصين17.0
3The University of Melbourneأستراليا27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources