Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology

Updated 9 مايو 2026
Country
Russian Federation
Founded
2011
Type
Education
ROR
03f9nc143
FWUR Rank#1,191 globally (of 4,980)#19 in Russian Federation
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 37.5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 506–2,734 (2,228 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#1,081, most generous score) and ARWU (#801, harshest score).

RUR
506[src]of 756
ARWU
801[src]of 996
CWUR
1,081[src]of 1,929
SCImago
2,734[src]of 4,699
FWUR
1,191of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU22.2
  • CWUR2.2
  • SCImago0

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
30.8ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
38.6CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2017/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,191 · 37.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
30.8
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
38.6
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 37.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE2025
Not ranked
timeshighereducation.com
CWUR2025
#1081
cwur.org
RUR2017
#506
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#2734
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1668 → #2873 (2021–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼147#1346QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU▼100#801CWUR▲21#1125RURNo dataSCImago▼216#2873
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017#506
2018
2019#1612
2020#1467
2021#1354#1668
2022#701#1210#2385
2023#701#1146#2657
2024#801#1125#2873

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Ural Federal University1169.0
2Novosibirsk State University1125.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityالولايات المتحدة1.0
2Tsinghua Universityالصين17.0
3The University of Melbourneأستراليا27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources