Rigas Tehniska universitate

Updated 9 مايو 2026
Country
Latvia
Founded
1862
Type
Education
ROR
00twb6c09
FWUR Rank#1,539 globally (of 4,980)#2 in Latvia
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 31.5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.15 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 5 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 633–5,027 (4,394 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1,001, most generous score) and SCImago (#5,027, harshest score).

RUR
633[src]of 1,128
QS
761[src]of 1,462
THE
1,001[src]of 2,119
CWUR
1,883[src]of 1,929
SCImago
5,027[src]of 4,699
FWUR
1,539of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS16.5
  • THE21.3
  • CWUR29
  • RUR12.5
  • SCImago31.5

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
50.4QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
23.2CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,539 · 31.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
50.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
23.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 31.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR2025
#1883
cwur.org
RUR2025
#633
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#5027
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #3695 → #5010 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲146#1629QS▲27#751THE▲200#1001ARWUNo dataCWUR▼121#1973RUR▲141#641SCImago▼520#5010
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3695
2010#549#3796
2011#547#4080
2012#623#4041
2013#665#4024
2014#682#4139
2015#682#3978
2016#686#3294
2017#801#697#3382
2018#651#801#709#3215
2019#751#801#702#1526
2020#701#1001#616#4984
2021#701#1001#1992#550#5157
2022#751#1001#1882#519#5163
2023#778#1201#1852#782#4490
2024#751#1001#1973#641#5010

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Rigas Stradina universitate1511.0
2Latvijas Universitate1917.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityالولايات المتحدة1.0
2Tsinghua Universityالصين17.0
3The University of Melbourneأستراليا27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources