New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

Updated 9 مايو 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1889
Type
Education
ROR
005p9kw61
FWUR Rank#3,140 globally (of 4,980)#360 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 2.9/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 401–6,033 (5,632 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#401, most generous score) and SCImago (#6,033, harshest score).

THE
401[src]of 1,386
CWUR
1,874[src]of 1,929
SCImago
6,033[src]of 4,699
FWUR
3,140of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR1.5
  • SCImago1.5

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
71.1THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
2.9CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2020/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #3,140 · 2.9
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
71.1
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
2.9
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 2.9 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR2025
#1874
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#6033
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1955 → #5559 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼465#2899QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▼8#1805RURNo dataSCImago▼1665#5559
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1955
2010#2168
2011#1966
2012#2147
2013#2090
2014#2020
2015#1696
2016#2195
2017#2290
2018#2377
2019#401#1383#941
2020#401#1558#3214
2021#1715#3420
2022#1762#4201
2023#1797#3894
2024#1805#5559

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Trinity University3135.0
2James Madison University3166.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of Oxfordالمملكة المتحدة5.0
2Tsinghua Universityالصين17.0
3The University of Melbourneأستراليا27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources