Kazan National Research Technological University

Updated 9 مايو 2026
Country
Russian Federation
Founded
1932
Type
Education
ROR
01b7wh712
FWUR Rank#2,919 globally (of 4,980)#91 in Russian Federation
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 9.6/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 960–7,806 (6,846 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1,501, most generous score) and SCImago (#7,806, harshest score).

RUR
960[src]of 1,128
QS
1,401[src]of 1,462
THE
1,501[src]of 2,119
SCImago
7,806[src]of 4,699
FWUR
2,919of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS2.5
  • THE22.4
  • RUR2.5
  • SCImago6.8

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
16.7QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
15RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,919 · 9.6
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
16.7
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
15
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 9.6 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR
RUR2025
#960
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#7806
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #4609 → #7762 (2012–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼571#2360QS▲59#1001THE▼300#1501ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRUR▼51#963SCImago▼753#7762
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012#4609
2013#4857
2014#4967
2015#5013
2016#4806
2017#735#3982
2018#758#4376
2019#1001#725#2963
2020#1001#688#6346
2021#1001#727#6996
2022#801#1201#750#7066
2023#1060#1201#912#7009
2024#1001#1501#963#7762

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityالولايات المتحدة1.0
2Tsinghua Universityالصين17.0
3The University of Melbourneأستراليا27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources