Jilin Agricultural University

Updated 9 مايو 2026
Country
China
Founded
1948
Type
Education
ROR
05dmhhd41
FWUR Rank#2,000 globally (of 4,980)#247 in China
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 22.4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 901–2,891 (1,990 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#2,891, most generous score) and ARWU (#901, harshest score).

ARWU
901[src]of 996
CWUR
1,498[src]of 1,929
SCImago
2,891[src]of 4,699
FWUR
2,000of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU12.8
  • CWUR0
  • SCImago16.1

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
24.1ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
22.4CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,000 · 22.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
24.1
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
22.4
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 22.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#1498
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#2891
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #3813 → #3251 (2010–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼209#1938QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▲80#1661RURNo dataSCImago▼561#3251
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010#3813
2011#4093
2012#4278
2013#4116
2014#4134
2015#4646
2016#4113
2017#3545
2018#3197
2019#1909#1853
2020#1902#3730
2021#1904#3423
2022#1763#3755
2023#1741#2690
2024#1661#3251

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1North China University of Technology1998.0
2Wuyi University1988.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityالولايات المتحدة1.0
2University of Oxfordالمملكة المتحدة5.0
3The University of Melbourneأستراليا27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources