Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee

Updated 9 مايو 2026
Country
India
Founded
1847
Type
Education
ROR
00582g326
FWUR Rank#1,045 globally (of 4,980)#26 in India
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 54.2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 339–2,958 (2,619 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#339, most generous score) and ARWU (#801, harshest score).

QS
339[src]of 1,462
RUR
460[src]of 1,139
THE
501[src]of 1,386
ARWU
801[src]of 996
CWUR
851[src]of 1,929
SCImago
2,958[src]of 4,699
FWUR
1,045of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS30.4
  • ARWU26.8
  • CWUR9.4
  • SCImago9.4

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
28.4ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
70.4QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
57.8CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2020/2023/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,045 · 54.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
28.4
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
70.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
57.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 54.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#851
cwur.org
RUR2023
#460
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#2958
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1594 → #2755 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼30#1041QS▲2#369THENo dataARWU▲200#701CWUR▼20#880RURNo dataSCImago▲686#2755
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1594
2010#401#311#1499
2011#401#291#1456
2012#401#342#1628
2013#401#351#376#1718
2014#351#611#484#1605
2015#461#351#638#487#1686
2016#391#501#597#486#1914
2017#399#501#617#422#1433
2018#431#501#801#858#461#1826
2019#381#401#901#788#1147
2020#383#501#901#849#2897
2021#383#901#860#3222
2022#400#701#841#3035
2023#371#901#860#460#3441
2024#369#701#880#2755

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology1028.0
2Jadavpur University1063.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityالولايات المتحدة1.0
2University of Oxfordالمملكة المتحدة5.0
3Tsinghua Universityالصين17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources