Georgian Technical University

Updated 9 مايو 2026
Country
Georgia
Founded
1922
Type
Education
ROR
00aamz256
FWUR Rank#2,100 globally (of 4,980)#4 in Georgia
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 21.2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 1,001–9,196 (8,195 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#1,001, most generous score) and SCImago (#9,196, harshest score).

QS
1,001[src]of 1,462
THE
1,501[src]of 2,119
CWUR
1,676[src]of 1,929
SCImago
9,196[src]of 4,699
FWUR
2,100of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS10.4
  • THE8
  • CWUR8
  • SCImago21.2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
30.4QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
13.2CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,100 · 21.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
30.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
13.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 21.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR2025
#1676
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#9196
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #4672 → #8578 (2013–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼320#2784QS#1401THE#1501ARWUNo dataCWUR▼134#1760RURNo dataSCImago▼819#8578
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013#4672
2014#5043
2015#5088
2016
2017#5223
2018#5448
2019#2923
2020#1746#6111
2021#1661#6141
2022#1642#7778
2023#1626#7759
2024#1401#1501#1760#8578

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Ilia State University2011.0
2Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University1964.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityالولايات المتحدة1.0
2Tsinghua Universityالصين17.0
3The University of Melbourneأستراليا27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources