Fu Jen Catholic University

Updated 9 مايو 2026
Country
Taiwan
Founded
1925
Type
Education
ROR
04je98850
FWUR Rank#1,906 globally (of 4,980)#22 in Taiwan
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 25.3/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.15 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 5 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 836–3,805 (2,969 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1,201, most generous score) and QS (#1,201, harshest score).

RUR
836[src]of 1,128
QS
1,201[src]of 1,462
THE
1,201[src]of 2,119
CWUR
1,335[src]of 1,929
SCImago
3,805[src]of 4,699
FWUR
1,906of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS7.4
  • THE18.1
  • CWUR5.6
  • RUR0.7
  • SCImago6.2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
19SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
30.6QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
28.4CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,906 · 25.3
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
19
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
30.6
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
28.4
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 25.3 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR2025
#1335
cwur.org
RUR2025
#836
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#3805
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2332 → #3410 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲173#1685QS▲25#1201THE#1001ARWUNo dataCWUR▼43#1288RUR▲166#800SCImago▲673#3410
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2332
2010#2373
2011#601#2541
2012#601#626#2585
2013#657#2745
2014#974#664#2472
2015#701#971#722#2392
2016#701#601#997#675#2261
2017#701#801#740#2250
2018#801#801#663#2583
2019#801#801#1129#690#1409
2020#1001#801#1180#683#3118
2021#1001#801#1206#642#3128
2022#1001#1001#1225#801#3834
2023#1226#1001#1245#966#4083
2024#1201#1001#1288#800#3410

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1National Taiwan Ocean University1930.0
2National Ilan University1946.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityالولايات المتحدة1.0
2University of Oxfordالمملكة المتحدة5.0
3The University of Melbourneأستراليا27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources