Chung-Ang University

Updated 9 مايو 2026
Country
South Korea
Founded
1918
Type
Education
ROR
01r024a98
FWUR Rank#536 globally (of 4,980)#15 in South Korea
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 68.8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 368–1,294 (926 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#401, most generous score) and ARWU (#701, harshest score).

RUR
368[src]of 1,128
THE
401[src]of 2,119
QS
479[src]of 1,462
CWUR
620[src]of 1,929
ARWU
701[src]of 996
SCImago
1,294[src]of 4,699
FWUR
536of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS1.5
  • THE12.3
  • ARWU39.1
  • CWUR0.9
  • RUR1.3
  • SCImago3.7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
51.1ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
74.2QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
67.7CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #536 · 68.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
51.1
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
74.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
67.7
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 68.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#620
cwur.org
RUR2025
#368
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1294
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #2293 → #1147 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼17#557QS▼102#494THE▲200#401ARWU#701CWUR▼7#632RUR▲74#393SCImago▼3#1147
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2293
2010#488#2234
2011#501#366#2160
2012#551#439#2078
2013#501#397#1684
2014#834#409#1445
2015#441#756#397#1223
2016#461#501#798#376#907
2017#386#401#501#812#285#854
2018#1001#401#601#608#267#987
2019#397#501#501#646#278#559
2020#412#501#601#655#1301
2021#403#601#701#654#337#1211
2022#414#601#701#637#452#1027
2023#392#601#701#625#467#1144
2024#494#401#701#632#393#1147

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Sejong University542.0
2Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Technology509.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityالولايات المتحدة1.0
2University of Oxfordالمملكة المتحدة5.0
3The University of Melbourneأستراليا27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources