Chonnam National University

Updated 9 مايو 2026
Country
South Korea
Founded
1952
Type
Education
ROR
05kzjxq56
FWUR Rank#862 globally (of 4,980)#27 in South Korea
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 53.4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 485–1,687 (1,202 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#485, most generous score) and QS (#901, harshest score).

CWUR
485[src]of 1,929
RUR
592[src]of 1,128
ARWU
601[src]of 996
THE
801[src]of 2,119
QS
901[src]of 1,462
SCImago
1,687[src]of 4,699
FWUR
862of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS15
  • THE8.8
  • ARWU13.7
  • CWUR21.5
  • RUR5.8
  • SCImago10.7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
51.9ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
50.3QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
61.3CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #862 · 53.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
51.9
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
50.3
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
61.3
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 53.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#485
cwur.org
RUR2025
#592
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1687
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

QS fell #551 → #851 (2011–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲64#844QS▼93#851THE▲200#801ARWU▲100#501CWUR▼18#465RUR▲93#601SCImago▼157#1465
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1187
2010#1234
2011#551#473#1261
2012#551#523#1129
2013#651#559#960
2014#400#568#946
2015#651#384#600#830
2016#651#601#420#562#639
2017#601#601#501#431#554#647
2018#601#601#501#432#516#898
2019#651#801#601#455#541#459
2020#701#801#501#440#498#1198
2021#701#801#501#430#508#1028
2022#751#1001#501#435#546#1268
2023#758#1001#601#447#694#1308
2024#851#801#501#465#601#1465

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Inha University844.0
2Yeungnam University838.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityالولايات المتحدة1.0
2University of Oxfordالمملكة المتحدة5.0
3The University of Melbourneأستراليا27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources