Binus University

Updated 9 مايو 2026
Country
Indonesia
Founded
1974
Type
Education
ROR
03zmf4s77
FWUR Rank#1,184 globally (of 4,980)#7 in Indonesia
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 41.9/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 851–3,816 (2,965 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1,201, most generous score) and SCImago (#3,816, harshest score).

QS
851[src]of 1,462
THE
1,201[src]of 2,119
SCImago
3,816[src]of 4,699
FWUR
1,184of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS0
  • THE1.5
  • SCImago23

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
18.8SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
42.6QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
No data

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,184 · 41.9
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
18.8
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
42.6
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
No data
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 41.9 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR
RUR
SCImago2025
#3816
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #4881 → #3532 (2016–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲122#1535QS▲29#1001THE#1201ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImago▲1274#3532
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016#4881
2017#5191
2018#5533
2019#3151
2020#801#6054
2021#801#6202
2022#1001#1201#5696
2023#1030#1201#4806
2024#1001#1201#3532

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Institut Teknologi Bandung1228.0
2Universitas Padjadjaran1138.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityالولايات المتحدة1.0
2University of Oxfordالمملكة المتحدة5.0
3Tsinghua Universityالصين17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources