Belarusian National Technical University

Updated 9 مايو 2026
Country
Belarus
Founded
1920
Type
Education
ROR
040a2r459
FWUR Rank#2,105 globally (of 4,980)#2 in Belarus
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 0/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 851–9,071 (8,220 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#851, most generous score) and RUR (#1,147, harshest score).

QS
851[src]of 1,462
RUR
1,147[src]of 1,139
SCImago
9,071[src]of 4,699
FWUR
2,105of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS20.9
  • SCImago20.9

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
41.9QS

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
0RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2023/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,105 · 0
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
41.9
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
0
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 0 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

THE
ARWU
CWUR
RUR2023
#1147
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#9071
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #5131 → #8646 (2018–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼44#1889QS▼45#801THENo dataARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImago▼481#8646
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014#663
2015#701
2016#701#681
2017#701
2018#751#5131
2019#801#3429
2020#801#6829
2021#801#6821
2022#751#7259
2023#756#1147#8165
2024#801#8646

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Belarusian State University1426.0
2Grodno State Medical University2932.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard Universityالولايات المتحدة1.0
2Tsinghua Universityالصين17.0
3The University of Melbourneأستراليا27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources